York University Faculty of Environmental Studies

 

Business and Environment Research Initiative

 

One priority of the FES B&E program is support for, and generation of, research that is—theoretically and practically—relevant to ecological development, particularly development in this region.  Besides being useful in its own right, such research is also a convenient way of attracting internships to FES, and setting up B&E students for good green work on graduation.  Although important in grounding our program, our connection to local green development is in no way exclusive of preparation for eco-development anywhere else; quite the contrary. 

 

The mandate of the B&E program at FES is to go beyond narrow business and environmental standpoints and highlight holistic and cross-disciplinary perspectives on sustainability.  While we are concerned with conventional corporate social responsibility (CSR), business ethics, and environmental management, we also want to call attention to the expanding realms of social and environmental enterprise that constitute more fundamental alternatives to business-as-usual.  This includes not only grassroots green enterprise in agriculture, energy, manufacturing, and waste; but also the economic environment and regulatory infrastructure to support this enterprise.  This entails going beyond mainstream environmentalism and CSR to questions of economic democracy, human potential, social justice and community development. 

 

The FES B&E Research Project is intended as a clearinghouse and meeting-place of the needs of local enterprises and organizations, on one hand, and the interests and skills of FESers, on the other.  B&E students can hopefully draw inspiration from the topics and ideas on this site in selecting foci for their particular research efforts—be they term papers, independent directed studies, or Major Papers and Projects. 

 

Suitable topics for B&E Research can be derived from many different sources, spanning from traditional CSR to more cutting-edge social- and eco-development.  For the time being, we will be emphasizing several core (and overlapping) realms:

  1. “Living Economy” support research
  2. Green Product research
  3. Alternative Valuation / Sustainability Indicators research

 

Living Economy Research

The “Living Economy,” is a concept that is increasingly being used to highlight the interconnection between social and environmental dimensions of sustainability, and to focus attention on the most important purposes and processes of the economy.  While critical of many established relationships, it is unremittingly positive, emphasizing the potential of community-oriented green development.  

 

This research realm includes many different areas, from green market creation to new business models, from socially-responsible investment strategies to ecological tax shifting.  Because of its emphasis on practice, however, it takes its most important cues from emerging “local living economy” business networks which are trying to implement these practices. 

 

See the webpage for the new Toronto Business Alliance for a Local Living Economy (Toronto BALLE). 

 

Toronto BALLE is in the process of developing its own particular research agenda.  A common concern of all BALLE networks is market transformation through the Local First campaign, a form of “buy local” initiative.  Local First strategies involve data on the local economy that is often not readily available—notably on the relative impacts of local (LOIS: locally-owned import-substituting) and global/transnational (TINA: there is no alternative) businesses.  Many Local First campaigns are timed to coincide with the release of major reports on the local economy—e.g. local leakage studies and reports on perverse subsidies that undermine community economies. 

 

There are many other dimensions to creating living economies, many of which are specific to the economic sector or specific region involved.  In every sector there are cutting-edge enterprises expanding the boundaries of regenerative (and not simply “sustainable’) development, and both social and ecological potentials which are becoming manifest in community-development and green-economic visions.  Research is essential to revealing and actualizing these potentials.  And it must take place on many levels.

 

One major concern, even when there is a vision of green development, is finance.  How can we get capital and necessary resources to the activities we know must take place? 

 

An equally basic question about regenerative development is how can we shape the many forms of incentives,  disincentives and driving forces to encourage positive forms of production, consumption and exchange?  It is not a simply a matter of state vs. markets, public vs. private, “command and control” vs. voluntarism.  The very nature of both markets and regulation must change.  Initiatives in some cities include the reform and redesign of the tax system to “level the playing field” for eco-enterprise.  See, e,g. Wayne Roberts, Making Taxes Sexy: Green gurus say we should use city taxes to punish ugliness and reward sustainability, NOW magazine, vol. 24, no. 52, Aug. 25-31, 2005

 

Another realm that can transform both markets and regulation—particularly for large corporations that cannot avoid putting the economic bottom line first—is Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) based on a life-cycle approach to production and consumption.  EPR is associated in the public mind with “take-back” legislation (as with “bottle return” measures) but EPR is actually a more fundamental principle of green economics—that  can and must take many different forms depending on the product and circumstances.  Local First campaigns that mobilize consumer power, for example, can be seen as forms of “informational EPR” that can have a similar effect in “closing the loops” as take-back legislation.  EPR is all about finding the systemic mechanisms of stewardship—building social & ecological value into everyday production and exchange.

 

Key domains of research for living economies include:

  • business models for regenerative enterprise in agriculture, energy, recycling, etc.
  • possibilities for business and community networks (e.g. eco-industrial and bioregional economic development)
  • survey of technologies for regenerative enterprise in agriculture, energy, recycling, etc.
  • possibilities for innovation in financing strategies for green and community enterprise.
  • assessment of potentials for self-reliance and localization in key sectors.
  • design of monetary systems to encourage both social equity and sustainable production.
  • and more.

 

Green Product Research

Green product research is a topic which can be considered a vital part of both living economy research (research topic #1) and alternative valuation systems (research topic #3).  But because of its centrality to green market campaigns, eco-industrial product design, and to the many levels of alternative valuation, it deserves a special focus of its own. 

 

The central project of this focus will be a Green Products Catalog.  This will take time to build, but the goal will be to provide a single web-based Toronto location to find information on preferable purchases in all main product areas: electronics, household appliances, building materials, and more.  The emphasis will be on quality and “best case” products, rather than trying to decide what bad products are less bad. 

 

Some of the social and environmental benefits of such a catalogue are so obvious that we might wonder why such a directory—or website linking various products—does not already exist.  Even many committed environmentalists are often totally clueless about where the products they use come from, what they’re made of, and what the respective social, economic and environmental impacts of these products are.  Since birth, we have been immersed in a mass cultural sea of deliberate misinformation and propaganda: advertising.  The cultivation of increasingly sophisticated, easily-understood product knowledge is both one of the most subversive—and one of the most regenerative--contributions to eco-literacy that can be made today. 

 

Such product knowledge is obviously a tremendous service to consumer decision-making.  But it also has much greater implications.  It can be an important lever in transforming local economies in social and ecological directions.  While privatized green consumerism can be a diversion from real change, combining consumption choices on the community level can exert major economic power.  It can create large green markets; influence government policy and procurement;  support local development; influence both product design and product-service delivery systems; spur eco-industrial development; shape extended producer responsibility (EPR) relationships; support community- and regenerative- business;  encourage social justice, fair trade and fair wages; and create green jobs and right livelihood.  Here at York, it can be an important procurement tool for greening the university, a task already underway, and involving B&E students like Michelle Osbourne. 

 

There are many levels on which this research can take place.  Those with a scientific or engineering bent will find plenty to interest them in specialized technical realms of life-cycle assessment (LCA).  But generally, our research at FES will not be of the basic scientific variety, but synthesizing available information in convenient and easily comprehensive ways for various constituencies:  private consumers, procurement officers, designers and specification writers, retailers, etc.

 

Some students may want to explore products in one sector—like building materials (which represent maybe 40 percent of our economy’s resource throughput); or household products; or electronic equipment; or art supplies.  Some researchers may want to explore toxic chemical substitution.  Others may want to explore market potentials for green products.  Others may want to design community economic development strategies made possible by the database.  

 

As with our work in green taxation, EPR, socially-responsible investment, soft energy, etc., green product research can find an almost immediate use by emerging green economic networks.  BALLE’s Local First campaigns can be enriched significantly by green product directories that can help make “local” ever more environmental and socially-just.  One of continental BALLE’s pioneering new initiatives, currently in development, is the BALLE Marketplace.  It will be a listing of all BALLE businesses in North America.  It can be a guide to product purchase to optimize regeneration.  If a desired product is not available locally, one can search in increasingly larger radii until one finds what one wants.  Even if a product is not local, its purchase can still contribute to an independent living business somewhere.   While York FES sees the B&E product database as autonomous effort, it will be designed to mesh with the emerging North American BALLE marketplace. 

 

It’s important to emphasize that we do not see our green products emphasis as competing with other similar projects.  We don’t want to reinvent the wheel or deflate the efforts of others.  We can work to harmonize efforts.  The point is that this region needs a central website where people (individual consumers, designers, retailers, etc.) can go to get information on almost any product category—and to find out where to purchase these products and/or services.  At the moment, we are still far from this situation, and thus at the mercy of ignorance in the marketplace.  Our concern is not who can remedy this situation, or who gets the credit, but that it gets done. 

 

How we go about this work depends on the time and resources available.  Some of the work involved for a directory dovetails with interests that many B&Eers already have—in EPR, or green market creation, etc.  Some of the work may also depend on related efforts outside York.  All this is open for discussion.  At this point, it is intended for you to contemplate possibilities for your research, your learning goals, and future opportunities.  

 

 

Alternative Valuation / Sustainability Indicators research

Under the radar of mass media, and largely hidden by dominant trends of globalization, a value revolution is taking place in virtually every sector of the economy.  Despite the apparent power of capitalist markets geared to accumulation and profit maximization, the failure of these markets to reflect the full (and growing) social and environmental costs of production and exchange has spawned movements for “market transformation” in building, food, energy, manufacturing and other sectors. 

 

Some of these efforts at market transformation focus on incorporating social and environmental costs into market prices.  But some insist on the integrity of social and ecological values in themselves—rather than having them translated into dollars.  They constitute new kinds of accounting systems prioritizing qualitative rather than monetary wealth.  David Korten uses the term “mindful markets” to describe the goals of grassroots efforts to build social and ecological values into everyday exchange. 

 

Commonly called “sustainability indicators,” these tools range from rigorous life-cycle assessment (LCA) to eco-footprints to community indicators.  Very often they are associated with labeling and third-party certification systems: for organic food, green building assessment (e.g. LEED), green energy, sustainably-harvested wood, etc. 

 

The fact is that third-party certification is one of the most significant and rapidly-growing areas of green economics and community development.  In less than a decade, many current MES students will be working as experts in this area of third-party certification.  These valuation systems are the basis on which EPR and green tax systems are being designed, and they are the underlying assessment tools for green product labeling.  These valuation systems tend to be incorporated into green market creation schemes, which are simultaneously (1) forms of market creation, (2) systems of qualitative valuation, and (3) rigorous modes of civil society-based economic regulation, often outside the realm of government.   Some of these systems are very early in their development.  Others—like organic food certification and LEED building assessment—are exploding into the mainstream, generating new controversies and alliances.

 

Here in the B&E program, students are encouraged to look closely at these developments and understand the opportunities for their own involvement.  Research in this area can not only provide students with useful and increasingly relevant skills, but also make a tangible contribution to eco-development in this region.  We intend to extend and build our connections with local groups involved in these valuation systems, as well as call attention to FES courses and faculty who are already involved in some aspect of this work.

 

 

Research Topics

A priority for establishing these new research efforts depends upon MESers discovering areas that excite them, where they can meet their MES learning goals while contributing useful information to green and community economic development.   This site will provide some general lists of relevant research areas, including specific suggestions from individuals and organizations involved with either practical business and economic development, or with research already underway in these areas.

 

Watch for the Research Topics Page!

 

 

to Business & Environment Collective Website

to FES B&E Program Webpage